logo
  • Home   
  • Research Group Profile   
  • Applications   
  • Services   
  • Contact Us   
  • Edge Detection

  • EXAMPLES:
    • i) 1d signal with different edge types
    • ii) 1d signal with different edge types and Gaussian noise
    • iii) SUSAN test image
    • iv) SUSAN test image with affine perturbation
    • v) SUSAN test image with quadratic perturbation
    • vi) Test image with Gaussian noise
    • vii) Chessboard test image
  • i) 1d signal with different edge types
  • Fig9 from Smith & Brady 1997
    (a)
    Edge Types and Input Signal
    (b)
  • Edge Map for Fig9 from Smith & Brady 1997
    (c)
    • (a) Input signal with various edge types.
    • (b) Edge map displayed superimposed to the input signal.
    • (c) Edge map corresponding to l=0.1 and it =104.
      up
  • ii) 1d signal with different edge types and with Gaussian noise
  • Fig9 from Smith & Brady 1997
    (a)
    Edge and Input Signal
    (b)
  • Edge Map for Fig9
    (c)
    • (a) Input signal with various edge types and with Gaussian noise.
    • (b) Edge map displayed superimposed to the input signal.
    • (c) Edge map corresponding to l=10-8 and it =2.5∙104.
      up
  • iii) SUSAN test image
  • SUSAN test image
    (a)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (b)
  • SUSAN test image
    (c)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (d)
    • (a) SUSAN test image used in the paper 'SUSAN - A new approach to low level image processing' by Smith S.M. and Brady J.M. in International J. Computer Vision 23 (1997) 45-78.
    • (b) Canny edge detection applied to the SUSAN Test image.
    • (c) SUSAN edge detection applied to the SUSAN Test image with parameter t=10.
    • (d) Our edge detector applied to the SUSAN Test image using l=0.1, it =1 and thres =1.
      up
  • iv) SUSAN test image with an affine perturbation
  • SUSANTestImg
    (a)
    Canny edges
    (b)
  • SUSANEdges
    (c)
    OurEdges
    (d)
    • (a) SUSAN test image with the addition of the affine function ƒ(i,j)=5∙(i-j).
    • (b) Canny edges.
    • (c) SUSAN edges with parameter t=10.
    • (d) Our edges for l=0.1, it =1 and thres =1.
      up
  • v) SUSAN test image with a quadratic perturbation
  • SUSAN test image
    (a)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (b)
  • SUSAN test image
    (c)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (d)
    • (a) SUSAN test image with the addition of the quadratic function ƒ(i,j)=(j-255)2-(i-255)2.
    • (b) Canny edges.
    • (c) SUSAN edges with parameter t=10.
    • (d) Our edges for l=0.1, it =1 and thres =7.
      up
  • vi) Test image with Gaussian noise
  • SUSAN test image
    (a)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (b)
  • SUSAN test image
    (c)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (d)
    • (a) Test image with the addition of Gaussian noise.
    • (b) Canny edges with s=3.
    • (c) The edges displayed in this picture have been obtained by applying twice the SUSAN algorithm. When applied the first time, the SUSAN algorithm filters the Gaussian noise and returns a binary image with sligthly perturbed edges. By applying again the SUSAN algorithm on the filtered image, one is then able to extract the edges of the background picture.
    • (d) Our edges for l=0.001, it =1 and thres =90.
      up
  • vii) Chessboard test image
  • SUSAN test image
    (a)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (b)
    SUSAN test image
    (c)
    Canny for SUSAN test image
    (d)
    • (a) Chessboard test image.
    • (b) Canny edges.
    • (c) SUSAN edge detector.
    • (d) Our edges for l=0.1, it =10 and thres =190.
      up

Home | Profile | Applications | Terms of Service | Contact Us
© 2011 KEA All Rights Reserved

Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict